Asking "xAI/grok" a question about "Hello World!" syntax in Zig

This is my breaking the glass moment in ziggit, first post ever. Absolute noob to zig and noob to programming. This morning I asked “xAI/grok” which was:

Why all the extras syntax for simple “hello world !” in zig ?

const std = @import("std");

pub fn main() void {
    std.debug.print("Hello, {s}!\n", .{"World"});
}

I do understand that maybe the question itself could be better asked to get better result but I was curious to see what the community thinks about the answer I got back from the robot? Would you give a different answer because my initial thoughts were more specific about this line :

std.debug.print("Hello, {s}!\n", .{"World"});

So it’s answer was :


Zig’s “Hello, World!” syntax feels verbose compared to, say, Python’s print(“Hello, World!”) because Zig prioritizes explicitness, safety, and low-level control. Let’s break down why each part is there:

  1. const std = @import("std");
  • Zig doesn’t have a global namespace or implicit imports. You explicitly import the standard library (std) to use its functions, like print. This avoids name clashes and makes dependencies clear.

  • @import is Zig’s built-in mechanism for including modules, and std is the standard library module.

  1. pub fn main() void { ... }
  • Zig requires an explicit entry point (main) for executables, like C or Rust. The pub keyword makes it accessible to the linker, and void specifies no return value.

  • This structure ensures clarity about program startup and avoids ambiguity.

  1. std.debug.print("Hello, {s}!\n", .{"World"});
  • Zig’s std.debug.print is used for console output in this context. It’s part of the std.debug module, which is explicit about its debugging purpose (other output methods exist for different use cases).

  • The {s} format specifier and .{“World”} tuple are part of Zig’s type-safe formatting system. {s} indicates a string, and the tuple .{“World”} passes the argument explicitly. This design prevents format-string vulnerabilities (like C’s printf) and ensures type checking at compile time.

  • The \n is explicit for newline, as Zig doesn’t assume platform-specific line endings.

Why not simpler?

  • Explicitness: Zig avoids magic or implicit behavior to make code predictable, especially for systems programming where surprises can cause bugs.

  • Safety: The formatting system and explicit imports reduce errors, like mismatched format specifiers or accidental namespace pollution.

  • Control: Zig targets low-level programming, so it exposes details (like module paths) that higher-level languages abstract away.

  • No runtime assumptions: Unlike Python or JavaScript, Zig doesn’t rely on a heavy runtime or standard I/O defaults, keeping binaries lean.

Could it be shorter?

Zig could have a simpler print function or implicit std import, but that would sacrifice its design goals. For comparison, C’s printf("Hello, World!\n"); requires #include <stdio.h>, and Rust’s println!("Hello, World!"); needs std. Zig’s approach is verbose but aligns with its philosophy of clarity and control.

If you want a one-liner, you could theoretically write a custom wrapper (e.g., fn print(str: []const u8) void { std.debug.print("{s}\n", .{str}); }), but you’d still need the import and main structure for a complete program.


Well this post is basically me saying hi to the community and I am looking forward to your thoughts on this. I am currently reading Pedro Duarte Faria on introduction to zig and doing the ziglings exercices. I will also polish my skills to better write in the ziggit discourse with the chatbot helper.

Cheers everyone

Other than the above being a bit overwrought (a simple std.debug.print("Hello, World!\n", .{}); would have worked), this seems like a reasonable explanation.

4 Likes

Quite accurate response except for word “module” used too broadly. std is a module that covers all of standard library but std.debug is not a module, xAI/Grok is wrong here. It is a namespace defined in lib/std/debug.zig file. Modules need to be @import-ed but constituent namespaces are just followed like std.debug

7 Likes

Welcome to the community! :waving_hand: :smiling_face:

Ziglings exercises are great place to start, i especially recommend reading all the comments in them, they explain a lot.

PS: wait till you find out that this is the simplified hello world :wink:

2 Likes

The “type safety” of the format specifiers isn’t really it’s purpose.

The “s” is just to tell the formatter to format “world” as a string. You need to tell the formatter this because zig does not have a native string type.

The type of string literals is [6:0] const u8, where 6 is the length of the string and :0 mean it is null terminated. This means the formatter does not know if the string is an array of integers or an array of bytes that is supposed to be printed as text. This is why you will get a compile error unless you resolve this ambiguity by specifying the s format specifer.

A nice thing about zig here is that print is implemented in zig. You can read the code for it. It uses a good amount of comp time but it’s cool that it’s not a builtin. And these compile errors were chosen by the authors of the print function, they are not a feature of the zig compiler. Comptime allows the print function to be fully defined in zig. No hard-coded opaque magic from the compiler here. The print function could have easily been implemented to format [] const u8 as a string by default.

The type of the second parameter in print is an anonymous tuple (I think), and comp time allows the print function to do different behaviors based on the types of the tuple elements.

The compiler is generating different print functions for each print call (if the set of types are different and the format strings are different). One downside here is that if you are doing at a lot of printing, you can potentially bloat your binary with a lot of unique print functions.

3 Likes

Hi, Welcome to Ziggit! I’m glad you are interested in learning zig. I want to mention that we are working on an AI policy for ziggit and part of it is about posting output of AI/LLMs/Chatbots to the forum. As the policy/rules haven’t been formalized I won’t close this thread, but want to say please refrain from using LLM/AI to create topics or respond to chats, except for the assistance in translating. Thanks, and hope to hear more from you as you learn zig!

EDIT:
Replaced reference of AI policy for zig to Ziggit.

10 Likes

I hope that the ziggit AI policy will be balanced and does not ban AI/chatbot related topics entirely. AI is here to stay and will be the main tool used by new users learning Zig (or any other language for that matter). We have to walk a fine line here – on one hand side to prevent AI spam, on the other hand make AI a useful coding tool for Zig.

4 Likes

Since we are on the topic of AI. I am curious if anyone have tried to implement MCP server in Zig? I saw several in Rust.

1 Like