vcs: jujutsu (using it to interface to git repositories, recently converted my personal repositories from mercurial)
dotfiles: chezmoi (moved from stow)
Command line utilities I am using the most—in order—are:
Desktop and work laptop: Gentoo (systemd) with some FreeBSD VMs
Travel laptop (GPD Pocket 3): Alpine
Editor: neovim + lsp
Terminal: ghostty
Shell: bash. I used to use fish, but need to SSH into systems running bash constantly, it’s easier not to deal with do sets of shell muscle memory.
Desktop: KDE Plasma. I used to use Sway/i3 but realised that I rarely tile more than two windows on a display, so this means one less config to deal with.
VCS: Primarily git, but experimenting with fossil for a few small projects
Blog generator: posix shell and pandoc
Languages:
Work: C++, Zig, Go, Python
Fun: Zig, Go, Python, Raku, C, Assembly (x86 and arm primarily, but I’m learning 6502 and Z80)
Snapper + btrfs on my work laptop has saved me a few times. It’s hooked up to portage so that every time a package is installed, updated, or removed a snapshot of the rootfs subvolume gets taken (as well as hourly/daily/weekly/monthly snapshots). My home directory is on a separate subvolume so rollbacks to the rootfs subvolume don’t affect it.
OS: Fedora (Kinoite)
Window Manager: River Classic, KDE
Terminal: Ghostty
Shell: Fish
Editor: Neovim + Kickstart.nvim, sometimes Zed
VCS: Learning JJ, mostly git
Browser: Zen or Qutebrowser
Keyboard: Handwired Dactyl Manuform, working on building a Skeletyl right now.
I try to have a consistent workflow across Windows, Linux and macOS since I need to switch between those all the time, but this also limits the set of tools.
On Windows: busybox for Unix-like cmdline tools that also work in a regular cmd.exe or powershell.
Then for all platforms:
cmake
deno
fd (find files)
git
neovim (for quick edits in the terminal)
ninja
node(js)
python
ripgrep (find in files)
vscode (for dev work in all sorts of languages)
chrome and/or firefox
(unfortunately zvm isn’t on homebrew, it is on scoop though, and occassionally I need Xcode and Visual Studio which are also installed outside package managers)
That’s pretty much it. I like to keep customization to a minimum (e.g. no fancy window managers or vim plugins)
I have multicursor at home! [furiously types n.n.n.n.n.]
Nah, I do miss it sometimes. But much less than I did at first. The grammar just fits how my mind works: “delete in word”, done. “in word, delete”? I’m ok with having to say v first.
Someone will add multi-cursors to Neovim, someday. That’s what I keep telling myself anyway.
no judgement, but always being in select just make sense, you are already moving, might as well be selecting and maybe one day I’ll go back to nvim, if they get multicursor
I already tried it and I couldn’t explain but it’s really not as good as the one in helix or Zed, it really boils down to that, the multicursor, and speed because one thing I don’t like about nvim is that everything you need is a slow plugin away and all of them together can create a slow editor, which I don’t like, and I don’t want to spend time fixing the editor, but Helix is definitely barebone compared to the amazing setup and workflows people are able to implement in nvim
tbf i haven’t used nvim for about 2/3y maybe it’s better now
Window manager: Niri. Was on KDE, but Niri gives me +50% battery life vs KDE.
Terminal: foot - Alacritty and Kitty seemed to have divas writing them. Foot’s author seemed to prioritise the same things as me, and hadn’t gone feature crazy.
Shell: zsh - modernish but bash-compatible. I can live with bash too.
Editor: Emacs (am I alone?)
VC: git, but I really want to use mercurial… I miss it.
Yeah, foot is great but kind of underestimated because its not fancy or something. But it just works and needs almost no config. Btw all Wayland applications of foots author are great for usage with niri: fuzzel, fnott, fyi, yambar (before it was archived) imho.
This is either obviously true, or obviously not, depending on some mysterious and personal quality of the psyche. For me, not.
I’d say that the gap between not using a command language, and using one, is immense. Once crossed, the dialect itself is more a matter of taste or personality.
I remember this when kakoune came out, and was discussed on the Orange Website (which was tolerable in those days, kinda). The author (authors?) were sure they had fixed a fundamental flaw in Vim motions, and there were those who vigorously agreed, and those who adamantly reject the idea that this was a flaw in need of remedy, rather than a deliberate and correct design choice.
My synthesis being, those who perceive this flaw will find that kak mode fixes it. The rest of us are going to stick with the OG.
Slow? Your picker is going to use ripgrep no matter the editor I’m sure? You have the same language server? Complaining about shooting yourself in the foot with bad plugins, you may as well say the same about Linux, but for a lot of people the customizability is great. And you can just run a very slim, super fast neovim no problem.
I just tested blink auto complete vs. helix auto complete, and there is no doubt helix is slower to load the completion menu.
I also found that you need more key presses to achieve the common actions in helix? Like what is your equivalent of: ci” ? f”lmi”c?